On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:37:16AM +0200, ext Grazvydas Ignotas wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:29:16AM +0200, ext Grazvydas Ignotas wrote: >>>> >>>> Hmh, dbck is shared by the whole GPIO bank, so what happens if someone >>>> calls _set_gpio_debounce(bank, 1, 310) and then >>>> _set_gpio_debounce(bank, 2, 0)? This should leave debounce enabled for >>>> GPIO1, but you'll disable dbck on second call. GPIOs 0-31 share the >>>> same bank. >>> >>> but why would you call _set_gpio_debounce(bank, 2 0); without setting a >>> real >>> debounce value before ? >> >> ok then you could call >> _set_gpio_debounce(bank, 1, 310); >> _set_gpio_debounce(bank, 2, 310); >> _set_gpio_debounce(bank, 2, 0); >> >> The problem here is that debounce is still active for GPIO1, but you >> disable dbck for the whole bank. > > but then you enabled the clock twice. There's refcounting for the clock. Oh, it's fine then, forgot about clock refcounting. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
