RE: [PATCH 2/2] DSPBRIDGE: DSP recovery feature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




>-----Original Message-----
>From: Felipe Contreras [mailto:felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:00 PM
>To: Hebbar, Shivananda
>Cc: Guzman Lugo, Fernando; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Hiroshi DOYU; Ameya
>Palande; felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] DSPBRIDGE: DSP recovery feature
>
>On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Felipe Contreras
><felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Hebbar, Shivananda <x0hebbar@xxxxxx>
>wrote:
>>> Client app must register for MMUFault/DSPSysError events. Then only
>>> You will receive notifications.
>>
>> It is registered, and it was receiving notifications on old versions
>> of the bridge... not any more.
>
>Strike that strike... the regression happens only with this patch.
>Apparently the get_events ioctl fails constantly... that's why the
>MMUFAULT is not reported.

Do you mean applying DSP recovery process you are no able to receive MMUFault notifications?

I am going to check that case. Is there any possibility that the process is stuck waiting other event?

Regards,
Fernando.

>
>--
>Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux