Hey Sergio, On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Aguirre, Sergio <saaguirre@xxxxxx> wrote: > Hey! > > You guys take a "chill pill", ok? :) Let's not start shouting at people and point fingers. I'm not really angry, and I'm not blaming Thara either. I just tried to do some constructive criticism that was apparently not accepted, and I decided not to push it any further. > My 2 cents is that, usually, when discussion starts about a topic, or a > specific parts of code, you should remove irrelevant text, and substitute > by a "<snip>" line, just to give reference that some irrelevant text used to > be there... so if you're interested, just jump to the mailing list archive, and look it out for yourself. Indeed, specially when dealing with a heated argument, it's sometimes important to specify where you have snipped text. Although I think most of the time that's not needed, a "snip" comment is preferable to dozes or hundreds of extra lines. > Also, this is completely off topic, and has nothing to do with the original patch subject. Therefore a proper subject rename must happen. Right. > If you want to take this topic further, please figure it out between you two > And, if necessary, the list maintainer, allright? Yeah, that's something for Tony to decide, but I didn't think it was a good idea to push for it right now. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
