Mark, I'll re-submit the patch series using twl6040_codec instead of twl6030_codec, twl6030 is the power companion chip and twl4030 is the audio chip, so in the case of this patch should I send an incremental patch to rename it? Regards, Margarita > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 7:23 AM > To: Samuel Ortiz > Cc: Liam Girdwood; Olaya, Margarita; alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/7] OMAP4: PMIC: Add support for twl6030 codec > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:13:29PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > > > > Samuel are you OK with this ? > > > That seems fine, yes. > > Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > OK, I've applied this one now - the cross tree issues mean it seems > better to get into 2.6.34. I'll review the rest of the patches now. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
