> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:03 PM > To: Shilimkar, Santosh > Cc: tony@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx; sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Cousson, Benoit > Subject: RE: [PATCH 05/24] omap4: Add needed IRQ line into irqs.h > > On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxx] > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:15 PM > > > To: Shilimkar, Santosh > > > Cc: tony@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx; sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > > lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Cousson, Benoit > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 05/24] omap4: Add needed IRQ line into irqs.h > > > > > > How about just submitting the auto-generated IRQ file, convert the > > > existing in-tree users, and leave the old macros there and mark them > > > deprecated with a comment? Then for the next release, submit a patch to > > > change the newly-merged users and remove the deprecated macros? > > Sounds ok if we can keep both exist for some time. Will do this. > > There shouldn't be any need to keep the old macros after the 2.6.34 merge > window. Probably the best time to remove them would be in a patch queued > for the 2.6.35 merge window. > > Any new patches that use 44xx IRQs would be required to use the > autogenerated IRQ macros after the 2.6.34 merge. > > Now would also be a good time to get the autogenerated DMA data in, for > similar reasons. Both DMA files can't co-exist since the names are aligned. I shall try DMA changes as well. Regards, Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
