On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 06:31:35PM +0100, ext Guzman Lugo, Fernando wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Felipe Contreras [mailto:felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx] > >> Resource cleanup does not support that even without my proposed changes. > > > >Aha! I suspected it :P > > > Resource cleanup does not support that because it tries to unreserved > every chunk mapped. However it does not means the dspbridge does not > support reserving a big chunk of memory and mapping small parts of > that memory, but I have not tested it to confirm if it works. I think I did once and it didn't work, but I thought the problem was in my app. Anyway I think we should either forget about this use-case or fix the resource cleaning. > >> I just proposed a solution which fixes two issues in one patch. > >> Moreover if this change is merged when the second issue be fixed this > >> patch will not needed anymore, so why don't merge the patch which > >> fixes both errors at this moment? > > > >simple patches > complicated patches > The patch is more simple than it looks. Only one way to know :) > >Personally I think your patches should be a continuation to the patches > >I just proposed. > Yes, I think it would be better. Cool. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
