Re: [PATCHv3 1/1] OMAP3: PM: move omap opp layer from pm34xx.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 01:44:31PM +0100, ext Romit Dasgupta wrote:
> Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 01:00:05PM +0100, ext Romit Dasgupta wrote:
> >> Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 12:14:59PM +0100, ext Romit Dasgupta wrote:
> >>>>> From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> OMAP OPP layer functions now have dependencies of CONFIG_CPU_FREQ only.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> With this patch, omap opp layer now has its compilation flags
> >>>>> bound to CONFIG_CPU_FREQ. Also its code has been removed from pm34xx.c.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A new file has been created to contain cpu freq code related to
> >>>>> OMAP3: cpufreq34xx.c.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> NAK also for the following  non-working kernel (smartreflex without cpufreq).
> >>> Then this is a problem of dependency with smartreflex and cpufreq. In this case
> >>> better to solve this other problem with another patch. This patch is to rip off
> >>> cpufreq code from pm34xx, as stated in the above description.
> >> In that case the right fix should
> > 
> > OK
> > 
> >> 1) __not__ include opp.h for non cpufreq builds
> > 
> > I guess the patch is "more or less" this option, as it maps
> > all functions inside opp.h to nops if it is a cpufreq build.
> > And all related real code is not compiled.
> > 
> > Basically removes the opp layer  code if cpufreq is disabled.
> > 
> IMHO, making functions return 0 will give you run time issues when opp related
> APIs are called in non cpufreq path. So your patch will for the time being solve
> the build issue but not runtime issue. Hence I suggested to compile out opp.h if
> you are not using cpufreq. Solving a build issue is not the right fix for this.

No, they are cleaned up by compiler. The following:

+static inline unsigned long omap_twl_vsel_to_uv(const u8 vsel)
+{
+	return 0;
+}

will be translated to a nop in final kernel image.

That's the whole idea of this patch.


-- 
Eduardo Valentin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux