* Alexander Shishkin <virtuoso@xxxxxxxxx> [100105 10:08]: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:03:01 -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Alexander Shishkin <virtuoso@xxxxxxxxx> [100105 08:56]: > > > Commit f62349ee9788b1d94c55eb6c291d74a1f69bdd9e makes it possible to > > > have some other than first uart port as ttyS0, which breaks the workaround > > > serial_in_override() function which will try to address the first uart > > > port (for ttyS0) and not the one that was initialized. > > > > Nothing wrong with this patch.. But so we're back to having the ports move > > around again? That sucks. I wonder if we can initialize dummy 8250 ports > > somehow to keep the order correct to avoid confusion. > > It doesn't seem like any solution to this problem will suck less than the > current one, but let's think about it. My patch only addresses the issue I'm > having with the current solution. Agreed, we need to fix the problem first. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
