On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:03:01 -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Alexander Shishkin <virtuoso@xxxxxxxxx> [100105 08:56]: > > Commit f62349ee9788b1d94c55eb6c291d74a1f69bdd9e makes it possible to > > have some other than first uart port as ttyS0, which breaks the workaround > > serial_in_override() function which will try to address the first uart > > port (for ttyS0) and not the one that was initialized. > > Nothing wrong with this patch.. But so we're back to having the ports move > around again? That sucks. I wonder if we can initialize dummy 8250 ports > somehow to keep the order correct to avoid confusion. It doesn't seem like any solution to this problem will suck less than the current one, but let's think about it. My patch only addresses the issue I'm having with the current solution. Regards, -- Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
