Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 03:23:14AM +0100, ext Candelaria > Villareal, Jorge wrote: > >Is this because if two interrupts were set, my approach would > >not recognize it as one of the cases and exit without processing > >the interrupt? > > you don't have a break in your switch. your approach would go through > all irq cases no matter what :-p Mmm... But it _does_ have some breaks. Besides, I am still unsure that if structure should be used here. Code would be duplicated, for example, DN_IRQ_FULL and DN_IRQ_EMPTY share the same procedure to acknowledge the request.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
