On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:33:38AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 03:23:14AM +0100, ext Candelaria Villareal, Jorge wrote: > >So, it would be better if I had declared a platform_device structure > >in .../arch/arm/plat-omap/devices.c, and register its resources (irq > >and memory base) in there? > IMO yeah. It would look cleaner. But McBSP is the same mess so I don't > know what the ALSA people will say. Jarkko Nikula probably has some > ideas as he did most of the OMAP ASoC implementation. That's fine from an ASoC point of view. The McBSP code predates the ability to have platform devices for the individual components of the ASoC subsystem so it's jumping through some hoops that are no longer required. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
