RE: [PATCH 3/3] omap3evm: musb: Update power capability for OMAP3EVM (Rev >= E)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anand, Nishanth,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gadiyar, Anand
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 8:23 AM
> To: Menon, Nishanth; Gupta, Ajay Kumar; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxx; tony@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] omap3evm: musb: Update power capability for
> OMAP3EVM (Rev >= E)
> 
> > From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap-
> > > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gupta, Ajay Kumar
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 5:13 PM
> > >
> > [...]
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-
> > > musb.c
> > > index a80441d..529e2b1 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c
> > > @@ -148,10 +148,14 @@ static struct platform_device musb_device = {
> > >
> > >  void __init usb_musb_init(void)
> > >  {
> > > -     if (cpu_is_omap243x())
> > > +     if (cpu_is_omap243x()) {
> > >               musb_resources[0].start = OMAP243X_HS_BASE;
> > > -     else
> > > +     } else {
> > Do you need {} for a one liner? Checkpatch should have warned you I
> think..
> >
> 
> Er, CodingStyle says you need to do this, if the else clause
> has brackets.

Correct and also checkpatch didn't give any warning for this.

> 
> > >               musb_resources[0].start = OMAP34XX_HSUSB_OTG_BASE;
> > > +             /* OMAP3EVM Rev >= E can source 500mA */
> > > +             if (get_omap3_evm_rev() >= OMAP3EVM_BOARD_GEN_2)
> > > +                     musb_plat.power = 250;
> > > +     }
> > >       musb_resources[0].end = musb_resources[0].start + SZ_8K - 1;
> > >
> > >       /*
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_regs.h
> b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_regs.h
> > > index cc1d71b..a0314df 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_regs.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_regs.h
> > > @@ -72,6 +72,10 @@
> > >  #define MUSB_DEVCTL_HR               0x02
> > >  #define MUSB_DEVCTL_SESSION  0x01
> > >
> > > +/* ULPI VBUSCONTROL */
> > > +#define ULPI_USE_EXTVBUS     0x01
> > > +#define ULPI_USE_EXTVBUSIND  0x02
> > > +
> > >  /* TESTMODE */
> > >  #define MUSB_TEST_FORCE_HOST 0x80
> > >  #define MUSB_TEST_FIFO_ACCESS        0x40
> > > @@ -246,6 +250,7 @@
> > >
> > >  /* REVISIT: vctrl/vstatus: optional vendor utmi+phy register at 0x68
> */
> > >  #define MUSB_HWVERS          0x6C    /* 8 bit */
> > > +#define MUSB_ULPI_BUSCONTROL 0x70    /* 8 bit */
> > >
> > >  #define MUSB_EPINFO          0x78    /* 8 bit */
> > >  #define MUSB_RAMINFO         0x79    /* 8 bit */
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c b/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
> > > index 6761d20..c5fcc30 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
> > > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> > >  #include <asm/mach-types.h>
> > >  #include <mach/hardware.h>
> > >  #include <plat/mux.h>
> > > +#include <plat/board.h>
> > >
> > >  #include "musb_core.h"
> > >  #include "omap2430.h"
> > > @@ -203,6 +204,7 @@ int musb_platform_set_mode(struct musb *musb, u8
> > > musb_mode)
> > >  int __init musb_platform_init(struct musb *musb)
> > >  {
> > >       u32 l;
> > > +     u8 val;
> > >
> > >  #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2430)
> > >       omap_cfg_reg(AE5_2430_USB0HS_STP);
> > > @@ -239,6 +241,13 @@ int __init musb_platform_init(struct musb *musb)
> > >       l |= ULPI_12PIN;
> > >       omap_writel(l, OTG_INTERFSEL);
> > >
> > > +     /* Program PHY to use external Vbus supply for OMAP3EVM Rev >= E
> */
> > > +     if (get_omap3_evm_rev() >= OMAP3EVM_BOARD_GEN_2) {
> > > +             val = musb_readb(musb->mregs, MUSB_ULPI_BUSCONTROL);
> > > +             val |= ULPI_USE_EXTVBUS;
> > > +             musb_writeb(musb->mregs, MUSB_ULPI_BUSCONTROL, val);
> > > +     }
> > Do we want to do board specific logic inside a IP logic? Wont it be
> better to do it some way else?

We need to access musb controller register to program this so It has to be
In musb_platform_init() only but As Anand suggested we can use some flag
>From board file to avoid omap3_evm specific check here.

> 
> Maybe add a flag to pass down from the board files? I think other
> boards might also end up using this.

Looks good. I will take this in next revision.

-Ajay

> 
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nishanth Menon
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux