> From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap- > > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gupta, Ajay Kumar > > Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 5:13 PM > > > [...] > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb- > > musb.c > > index a80441d..529e2b1 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c > > @@ -148,10 +148,14 @@ static struct platform_device musb_device = { > > > > void __init usb_musb_init(void) > > { > > - if (cpu_is_omap243x()) > > + if (cpu_is_omap243x()) { > > musb_resources[0].start = OMAP243X_HS_BASE; > > - else > > + } else { > Do you need {} for a one liner? Checkpatch should have warned you I think.. > Er, CodingStyle says you need to do this, if the else clause has brackets. > > musb_resources[0].start = OMAP34XX_HSUSB_OTG_BASE; > > + /* OMAP3EVM Rev >= E can source 500mA */ > > + if (get_omap3_evm_rev() >= OMAP3EVM_BOARD_GEN_2) > > + musb_plat.power = 250; > > + } > > musb_resources[0].end = musb_resources[0].start + SZ_8K - 1; > > > > /* > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_regs.h b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_regs.h > > index cc1d71b..a0314df 100644 > > --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_regs.h > > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_regs.h > > @@ -72,6 +72,10 @@ > > #define MUSB_DEVCTL_HR 0x02 > > #define MUSB_DEVCTL_SESSION 0x01 > > > > +/* ULPI VBUSCONTROL */ > > +#define ULPI_USE_EXTVBUS 0x01 > > +#define ULPI_USE_EXTVBUSIND 0x02 > > + > > /* TESTMODE */ > > #define MUSB_TEST_FORCE_HOST 0x80 > > #define MUSB_TEST_FIFO_ACCESS 0x40 > > @@ -246,6 +250,7 @@ > > > > /* REVISIT: vctrl/vstatus: optional vendor utmi+phy register at 0x68 */ > > #define MUSB_HWVERS 0x6C /* 8 bit */ > > +#define MUSB_ULPI_BUSCONTROL 0x70 /* 8 bit */ > > > > #define MUSB_EPINFO 0x78 /* 8 bit */ > > #define MUSB_RAMINFO 0x79 /* 8 bit */ > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c b/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c > > index 6761d20..c5fcc30 100644 > > --- a/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c > > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c > > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ > > #include <asm/mach-types.h> > > #include <mach/hardware.h> > > #include <plat/mux.h> > > +#include <plat/board.h> > > > > #include "musb_core.h" > > #include "omap2430.h" > > @@ -203,6 +204,7 @@ int musb_platform_set_mode(struct musb *musb, u8 > > musb_mode) > > int __init musb_platform_init(struct musb *musb) > > { > > u32 l; > > + u8 val; > > > > #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2430) > > omap_cfg_reg(AE5_2430_USB0HS_STP); > > @@ -239,6 +241,13 @@ int __init musb_platform_init(struct musb *musb) > > l |= ULPI_12PIN; > > omap_writel(l, OTG_INTERFSEL); > > > > + /* Program PHY to use external Vbus supply for OMAP3EVM Rev >= E */ > > + if (get_omap3_evm_rev() >= OMAP3EVM_BOARD_GEN_2) { > > + val = musb_readb(musb->mregs, MUSB_ULPI_BUSCONTROL); > > + val |= ULPI_USE_EXTVBUS; > > + musb_writeb(musb->mregs, MUSB_ULPI_BUSCONTROL, val); > > + } > Do we want to do board specific logic inside a IP logic? Wont it be better to do it some way else? Maybe add a flag to pass down from the board files? I think other boards might also end up using this. > > Regards, > Nishanth Menon > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
