* Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@xxxxxx> [091022 10:38]:
> From 661b13474a7af62c54f7df7a33a818c5e782cc59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Madhu <madhu.cr@xxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:16:31 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] Omap3630: Add HSMMC related checks.
>
> Add omap3630 conditional checks to devices.c to allow HSMMC3 addition and
> mux configuration for HSMMC1/2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@xxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 5 +++--
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> index 7d4513b..1fdfc7f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static inline void omap2_mmc_mux(struct
> omap_mmc_platform_data *mmc_controller,
> }
> }
>
> - if (cpu_is_omap3430()) {
> + if (cpu_is_omap3430() || cpu_is_omap3630()) {
> if (controller_nr == 0) {
> omap_cfg_reg(N28_3430_MMC1_CLK);
> omap_cfg_reg(M27_3430_MMC1_CMD);
How about using cpu_is_omap34xx() here instead? It's more future proof.
Regards,
Tony
> @@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ void __init omap2_init_mmc(struct omap_mmc_platform_data
> **mmc_data,
> irq = INT_24XX_MMC2_IRQ;
> break;
> case 2:
> - if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap34xx())
> + if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap34xx()
> + && !cpu_is_omap3630())
> return;
> base = OMAP3_MMC3_BASE;
> irq = INT_34XX_MMC3_IRQ;
> --
> 1.6.0.4
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
