Hi, On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > This patch removes the SDRC AC timings changes done during core dvfs. > Updating AC timing CTRL values for SDRC during DVFS is seen to be a risk, > while the RFR CTRL value is safe to be updated. > > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx> just wanted to let you know, I haven't forgotten about this one. Am trying to get an answer from others as to whether AC timing register changes are completely unsafe, in which case your patch is probably the best way to move forward; or whether we can make the changes when no initiators are touching SDRAM. - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html