> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap- > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Shilimkar, Santosh > Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 10:51 AM > To: Tony Lindgren > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Paul Walmsley > Subject: RE: Patches merged to split OMAP2_IO_ADDRESS > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:tony@xxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 11:38 PM > > To: Shilimkar, Santosh > > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Paul Walmsley > > Subject: Re: Patches merged to split OMAP2_IO_ADDRESS > > > > * Shilimkar, Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> [091008 03:59]: > > > Tony, > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap- > > > > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren > > > > Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 5:55 AM > > > > To: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Cc: Paul Walmsley > > > > Subject: Patches merged to split OMAP2_IO_ADDRESS > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I've pushed Santosh' patches to split OMAP2_IO_ADDRESS into > > > > *_L3_IO_ADDRESS > > > > and *_L4_IO_ADDRESS so we can claim more kernel address space and > > support > > > > over 512MB of memory instead of 256MB. > > > > > > > > Of course, our goal is to convert everything except the .S files to > > > > use ioremap() instead, but that can now be done parallel and in > > smaller > > > > chunks. > > > > > > > > Please everybody, please convert your code to use ioremap(), there > are > > > > static mappings already in place so it should work out of the box. > > > > > > > > I also had add two quick patches to keep things compiling, > > > > Paul can you take a look at them? I could not really test them as > all > > > > the code is not there yet. Will post them as a reply to this thread. > > > Thanks for the merge!! > > > > > > I have boot tested below platforms with latest LO master. > > > > > > 1. OMAP3430 SDP board - BOOT OK > > > 2. OMAP3 BEAGLE - BOOT OK > > > 3. OMAP 4430 SDP - BOOT OK with variation of patch: > > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/50531/ > > > > Great. I guess we still have some issues on 24xx with the hwmod, > > but hopefully we'll get that working again soon. > > > > Can somebody with 512MB memory on a board try the current l-o master > > and make sure things work? > > > > Please check the dmesg for no overlaps in virtual address space, > > then run some memory test like memtester. > > Boot tested on OMAP4430 with 512MB and dmesg don't show any overlaps. Will > run some memory test tomorrow. > Run the memmark benchmark on OMAP4430 and not seen any issue. Regards, Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
