RE: [PATCH v4] OMAP3: introduce OMAP3630

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Menon, Nishanth 
> Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 10:56 AM
> To: linux-omap
> Cc: Menon, Nishanth; Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan; 
> Pandita, Vikram; Pais, Allen; Gadiyar, Anand; Cousson, 
> Benoit; Felipe Balbi; Kevin Hilman; Premi, Sanjeev; 
> Shilimkar, Santosh; Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto; Tony Lindgren
> Subject: [PATCH v4] OMAP3: introduce OMAP3630
> 
> **--- SNIP ME --
> Hi,
> A bit of history for this patchset
> V4 - Sergio's improvement to the handling of rev decision as we just
>      change the define to 3630 and remove crapy override logic in
>      omap3_check_revision from v3 patch

Now looks much better ;)

> V3 - Fixes from Sergio's comments + boot tested on SDP3430+3630.
> V2 - fixes of generic comments from Felipe Balbi+minor cleanups
> V1 - inital implementation of (a) approach
> V0 - original approach introducing a new silicon family
> **--- END OF SNIP ME --
> Device intro:
> OMAP3630 is the latest in the family of OMAP3 devices
> and among the changes it introduces are:
> 
> New OPP levels for new voltage and frequency levels. a bunch of
> Bug fixes to various modules feature additions, notably with ISP,
> sDMA etc.
> 
> Details about the chip is available here:
> http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wtbu/wtbuproductcontent.tsp?t
> emplateId=6123&navigationId=12836&contentId=52606
> 
> Strategy used:
> Strategy to introduce this device into Linux was discussed here:
> Ref: http://marc.info/?t=125343303400003&r=1&w=2
> 
> Two approaches were available:
> a) Consider 3630 generation of devices as a new family of silicon
> b) Consider 3630 as an offshoot of 3430 family of devices
> 
> As a common consensus, (b) seems to be more valid for 3630 as:
> * There are changes which are easily handled by using "FEATURES"
>   infrastructure.
>   For details how to do this, see thread:
>   http://marc.info/?t=125050998500001&r=1&w=2
> * Most of existing 34xx infrastructure can be reused(almost 90%+)
> 	- so no ugly if (cpu_is_omap34xx() || cpu_is_omap36xx())
> 	  all over the place
> 	- lesser chance of bugs due to reuse of proven code flow
> 	- 36xx specific handling can still be done where required
> 	  within the existing infrastructure
> 
> NOTE:
> * If additional 34xx series are added, OMAP3430_REV_ESXXXX can be
>   added on top of the existing 3630 ones are renumbered
> 
> This patch was tested on SDP3430, boot tested on 3630 platform using
> 3430sdp defconfig
> 
> Signed-off-by: Madhusudhan Chikkature Rajashekar <madhu.cr@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vikram Pandita <vikram.pandita@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Allen Pais <allen.pais@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sanjeev Premi <premi@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Sergio Alberto Aguirre Rodriguez <saaguirre@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Sergio Aguirre <saaguirre@xxxxxx>

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c              |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/cpu.h |    6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> index 03b80f2..ee3bb69 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> @@ -210,7 +210,9 @@ void __init omap3_check_revision(void)
>  	hawkeye = (idcode >> 12) & 0xffff;
>  	rev = (idcode >> 28) & 0xff;
>  
> -	if (hawkeye == 0xb7ae) {
> +	switch (hawkeye) {
> +	case 0xb7ae:
> +		/* Handle 34xx devices */
>  		switch (rev) {
>  		case 0:
>  			omap_revision = OMAP3430_REV_ES2_0;
> @@ -231,8 +233,26 @@ void __init omap3_check_revision(void)
>  		default:
>  			/* Use the latest known revision as default */
>  			omap_revision = OMAP3430_REV_ES3_1;
> -			rev_name = "Unknown revision\n";
> +			rev_name = "Unknown 34xx revision\n";
>  		}
> +		break;
> +	case 0xb891:
> +		/* Handle 36xx devices */
> +		switch (rev) {
> +		case 0:
> +			omap_revision = OMAP3630_REV_ES1_0;
> +			rev_name = "ES1.0";
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			/* Use the latest known revision as default */
> +			omap_revision = OMAP3630_REV_ES1_0;
> +			rev_name = "Unknown 36xx revision\n";
> +		}
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		/* Unknown default to latest rev as default*/
> +		omap_revision = OMAP3630_REV_ES1_0;
> +		rev_name = "Unknown revision\n";
>  	}
>  
>  out:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/cpu.h 
> b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/cpu.h
> index 431fec4..65f1882 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/cpu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/cpu.h
> @@ -383,6 +383,12 @@ IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430)
>  #define OMAP3430_REV_ES2_1	0x34302034
>  #define OMAP3430_REV_ES3_0	0x34303034
>  #define OMAP3430_REV_ES3_1	0x34304034
> +/* NOTE: Add 36xx series below
> + * If additional 34xx series are added, OMAP3430_REV_ESXXXX can be
> + * added above the 3630 defines and series renumbered to ensure
> + * rev() > checks to work
> + */
> +#define OMAP3630_REV_ES1_0	0x36301034
>  
>  #define OMAP443X_CLASS		0x44300034
>  
> -- 
> 1.6.0.4
> 
> --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux