On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 03:08:00PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> [091008 15:20]: > > <snip/> > > >> > Here you can see Uwe Kleine-K??nig sending the original patch without > >> > even CC'ing the mmc list: > >> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124820861213849&w=2 > >> > > >> > And it was unintentionally broken by this one: > >> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmc&m=125249763422227&w=2 > >> > >> Er, actually that one was ok, the problem was introduced only in the > >> final version: > >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmc&m=125366315417006&w=2 > > > > Right, looks like Roger forgot to Cc linux-mmc. > > > >> > I don't see what we are waiting for, the code is clearly broken, even > >> > the compiler warns that nobody is using omap_hsmmc_probe(). > > > > I've sent Roger's patch to Andrew & linux-mmc so hopefully it will get > > merged soon: > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg00539.html > > I don't see what's specific about mmc in that patch, nor omap. It's > just a fix for an obvious mistake that must be picked ASAP and can't > possibly be NAK'ed. > > There's a tree for trivial fixes: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jikos/trivial > > And one for includecheck: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6 > > What's the procedure for obvious fixes? I'm CC'ing Greg KH and Andrew > Morton because I think they might interested in fixing these kinds of > issues quickly in the future. What kind of issues? Why would I be interested, where is the problem? confused, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
