On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 03:43:33PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 02:58:57PM +0300, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>
> > + data->regulator = regulator_get(dev, "vdd");
> > + if (IS_ERR(data->regulator)) {
> > + dev_info(dev, "Could not get regulator for vdd. "
> > + "Executing without regulator.\n");
> > + data->regulator = NULL;
> > + }
>
> Similar comments to the previous patch apply to this driver - regulator
> usage should be unconditional, error messages should not be split over
> multiple lines and you should represent all the supplies separately (it
> looks like there's both VDD and CPVSS required here, for example) to
> avoid future surprises.
Yeah. The idea here was to keep driver running even if regulators
are not properly set in board files. Maybe those in which the regulator
is always on. That's why I wrote it with "nicely" message.
--
Eduardo Valentin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
