>-----Original Message----- >From: Shilimkar, Santosh >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/cpu.h b/arch/arm/plat- >> omap/include/mach/cpu.h >> index 431fec4..af1080f 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/cpu.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/cpu.h >> @@ -383,6 +383,12 @@ IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430) >> #define OMAP3430_REV_ES2_1 0x34302034 >> #define OMAP3430_REV_ES3_0 0x34303034 >> #define OMAP3430_REV_ES3_1 0x34304034 >> +/* NOTE: Add 36xx series below >> + * If additional 34xx series are added, OMAP3430_REV_ESXXXX can be >> + * added above the 3630 defines and series renumbered to ensure >> + * rev() > checks to work >> + */ >> +#define OMAP3630_REV_ES1_0 0x34305034 >> >> #define OMAP443X_CLASS 0x44300034 >Was expecting that this patch will add "cpu_is_omap36xx()" in cpu.h >apart from above. Is this handled in another patch ? Idea is to re-use all 34xx code for 36xx, as per the mail thread on list, and given in reference. Hence at run time, the check could be: if (omap_rev() == OMAP3630_REV_ES1_0) xxxxx cpu_is_omap34xx() will be true for 36xx as well. > > >Regards, >Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
