Nishanth Menon <menon.nishanth@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Kevin Hilman said the following on 10/01/2009 06:58 PM:
>> From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx>
>>
>> This patch adds the context save restore functions for GPMC
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/gpmc.h | 3 +
>> 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
>> index 1587682..86ea936 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
>> @@ -62,10 +62,38 @@
>> #define ENABLE_PREFETCH (0x1 << 7)
>> #define DMA_MPU_MODE 2
>>
>> +/* Structure to save gpmc cs context */
>> +struct gpmc_cs_config {
>> + u32 config1;
>> + u32 config2;
>> + u32 config3;
>> + u32 config4;
>> + u32 config5;
>> + u32 config6;
>> + u32 config7;
>> + int is_valid;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Structure to save/restore gpmc context
>> + * to support core off on OMAP3
>> + */
>> +struct omap3_gpmc_regs {
>> + u32 sysconfig;
>> + u32 irqenable;
>> + u32 timeout_ctrl;
>> + u32 config;
>> + u32 prefetch_config1;
>> + u32 prefetch_config2;
>> + u32 prefetch_control;
>> + struct gpmc_cs_config cs_context[GPMC_CS_NUM];
>> +};
>> +
>> static struct resource gpmc_mem_root;
>> static struct resource gpmc_cs_mem[GPMC_CS_NUM];
>> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(gpmc_mem_lock);
>> static unsigned gpmc_cs_map;
>> +static struct omap3_gpmc_regs gpmc_context;
>>
>> static void __iomem *gpmc_base;
>>
>> @@ -516,3 +544,68 @@ void __init gpmc_init(void)
>> gpmc_write_reg(GPMC_SYSCONFIG, l);
>> gpmc_mem_init();
>> }
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3
>>
> apologies if this is a dumb question - why is this under #ifdef -> if
> the save save restore structures are not under #ifdef?
Not a dumb question, good catch. I'll move the struct inside
this #ifdef.
Kevin
>> +void omap3_gpmc_save_context()
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + gpmc_context.sysconfig = gpmc_read_reg(GPMC_SYSCONFIG);
>> + gpmc_context.irqenable = gpmc_read_reg(GPMC_IRQENABLE);
>> + gpmc_context.timeout_ctrl = gpmc_read_reg(GPMC_TIMEOUT_CONTROL);
>> + gpmc_context.config = gpmc_read_reg(GPMC_CONFIG);
>> + gpmc_context.prefetch_config1 = gpmc_read_reg(GPMC_PREFETCH_CONFIG1);
>> + gpmc_context.prefetch_config2 = gpmc_read_reg(GPMC_PREFETCH_CONFIG2);
>> + gpmc_context.prefetch_control = gpmc_read_reg(GPMC_PREFETCH_CONTROL);
>> + for (i = 0; i < GPMC_CS_NUM; i++) {
>> + gpmc_context.cs_context[i].is_valid =
>> + (gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG7))
>> + & GPMC_CONFIG7_CSVALID;
>> + if (gpmc_context.cs_context[i].is_valid) {
>> + gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config1 =
>> + gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG1);
>> + gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config2 =
>> + gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG2);
>> + gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config3 =
>> + gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG3);
>> + gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config4 =
>> + gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG4);
>> + gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config5 =
>> + gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG5);
>> + gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config6 =
>> + gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG6);
>> + gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config7 =
>> + gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG7);
>> + }
>>
> here is a theoretical bug:
> 1: GPMC, 1, 2, 3 4 5 configured 6 7 not configured.
> 2. Save and restore 1: save and restore variables which are static will
> contain 1-5 and not 6&7
> 3. next I disable 2,3
> 3. save will save 1,4,5 BUT my variable will contain 1,2,3,4,5 ->
> restore will rename 2,3 (which I did not intend)..
>
> Regards,
> Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
