Re: [PATCH 0/4] Use reg instead of ti,bit-shift for clksel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [240302 19:18]:
> Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > If you had some good idea in mind for the #address-cells = <2> for the
> > remaining unconnected composite clocks maybe clarify it a bit.
> > 
> I was just wondering whether we could do reg = <register bit> then.

Yeah sure nothing stopping us from doing that too if it helps :)

Regards,

Tony




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux