Re: [PATCH 0/4] Use reg instead of ti,bit-shift for clksel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [240213 23:11]:
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 12:56:40 +0200
> Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > This series updates the clksel clocks to use the standard reg property
> > instead of ti,bit-shift.
> > 
> > I'd like to apply these before we make further use of the clksel clocks
> > to reduce the dtb check warnings.
> > 
> 
> hmm, we still have ti,bit-shift if these clocks are not used below a ti,clksel.
> Just wondering, can we completely deorbit ti,bit-shift if we used #address-cells = <2>;
> in those cases? I wait a bit with further txt->yaml conversions until
> this is settled.

No need to wait on the yaml conversion I think :) How about just tag the
ti,bit-shift property as deprecated? And add a comment saying it is only
needed for the remaining unconnected clocks.

Eventually we can move all the component clocks under clksel clocks, or the
related clock such as the dpll clock for the clkdcoldo clocks.

Regards,

Tony






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux