Re: [PATCH 02/14] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: move suspend/resume to suspend_noirq/resume_noirq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 6:08 PM Thomas Richard
<thomas.richard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 1/15/24 21:02, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 6:16 PM Thomas Richard
> > <thomas.richard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...

> >> +static const struct dev_pm_ops pinctrl_single_pm_ops = {
> >> +       SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pinctrl_single_suspend_noirq,
> >> +                                     pinctrl_single_resume_noirq)
> >> +};
> >
> > Use proper / modern macro.
>
> fixed, use DEFINE_NOIRQ_DEV_PM_OPS now

...

> >>  #endif
> >
> > Why ifdeferry is needed (esp. taking into account pm_ptr() use below)?
>
> We may have an "unused variable" warning for pinctrl_single_pm_ops if
> CONFIG_PM is undefined (due to pm_ptr).

This is coupled with the above. Fixing above will automatically make
the right thing.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux