On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 11:25 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> [230905 00:31]:
> > On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 11:37:46AM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
> > > I have an AM3517-EVM board that I am trying to use the latest 6.1.y
> > > stable, currently 6.1.51.
> > >
> > > With git bisect, I narrowed the regression between 6.1.15 and 6.1.16 to commit
> > > eaf9b5612a47 ("driver core: fw_devlink: Don't purge child fwnode's
> > > consumer links")
> > >
> > > In the regression, 48002000.scm appears as not ready. This affects a
> > > variety of dependent peripherals making them unavailable:
> > >
> > > wl12xx_buf platform: supplier 48002000.scm not ready
> > > wl12xx_vmmc2 platform: supplier wl12xx_buf not ready
> > > 48050000.dss platform: supplier display@0 not ready
> > > 48064800.ehci platform: supplier hsusb1_phy not ready
> > > backlight platform: supplier 48002000.scm not ready
> > > display@0 platform: supplier backlight not ready
> > > dmtimer-pwm@11 platform: supplier 48002000.scm not ready
> > > hsusb1_phy platform: supplier 48002000.scm not ready
> > > gpio-leds platform: supplier 48002000.scm not ready
> > > 480b4000.mmc platform: supplier wl12xx_vmmc2 not ready
> > >
> > > If I build 6.1.51 but I checkout drivers/base/core.c from commit
> > > 2455b81afe68 ("driver core: fw_devlink: Add DL_FLAG_CYCLE support to
> > > device links"),
> > > the regression is gone.
>
> Adam, maybe check if 6.1 stable series is missing something to be
> backported from this mailing list thread:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230207014207.1678715-2-saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> That email thread version seemed to work for me based on my reply in the
> thread. I recall issues with the earlier revisions but don't remember
> what fixed them.
Tony,
Indeed, it does appear that a patch was missing from the back-ported series.
Applying commit 4a032827daa8 ("of: property: Simplify
of_link_to_phandle()") to the 6.1.y branch appears
to fix the regression.
Thanks for the pointer to the series.
Stable group,
Do I need to send a separate e-mail requesting the backporting of that
commit to the 6.1.y branch?
adam
>
> > > I checked the 6.5 kernel, and it appears fine, so I think there is a
> > > possible backport commit missing, and I was hoping Saravana or Tony
> > > might have a suggestion as to which one(s) I should try. I don't know
> > > if this is found on other OMAP3 boards, but I wouldn't be surprised.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for the regression report. I'm adding it to regzbot as stable-specific
> > entry:
> >
> > #regzbot ^introduced: eaf9b5612a47f0
> > #regzbot title: keeping consumer links of child fwnode doesn't prepare AM3517-EVM suppliers
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
