Re: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: OMAP4: PM: PRM/CM module offsets for OMAP4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Rajendra, 

Some comments.

On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Rajendra Nayak wrote:

> This patch adds the offsets for new modules in PRM
> and CM for OMAP4
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h
> index cb1ae84..ab0dd8e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h
> @@ -49,6 +49,28 @@
>  #define OMAP3430_NEON_MOD				0xb00
>  #define OMAP3430ES2_USBHOST_MOD				0xc00
>  
> +/* OMAP44XX specific module offsets */
> +#define OMAP4430_OCP_SOCKET_MOD				0x0000
> +#define OMAP4430_CKGEN_MOD				0x0100
> +#define OMAP4430_MPU_MOD				0x0300
> +#define OMAP4430_DSP_MOD				0x0400
> +#define OMAP4430_ABE_MOD				0x0500
> +#define OMAP4430_ALWAYS_ON_MOD				0x0600
> +#define OMAP4430_CORE_MOD				0x0700
> +#define OMAP4430_IVAHD_MOD				0x0F00
> +#define OMAP4430_CAM_MOD				0x1000
> +#define OMAP4430_DSS_MOD				0x1100
> +#define OMAP4430_GFX_MOD				0x1200
> +#define OMAP4430_L3INIT_MOD				0x1300
> +#define OMAP4430_L4PER_MOD				0x1400
> +#define OMAP4430_CEFUSE_MOD				0x1600
> +#define OMAP4430_WKUP_MOD				0x1700
> +#define OMAP4430_WKUP_CM_MOD				0x1800
> +#define OMAP4430_EMU_MOD				0x1900
> +#define OMAP4430_EMU_CM_MOD				0x1A00
> +#define OMAP4430_DEVICE_MOD				0x1B00
> +#define OMAP4430_RESTORE_MOD				0x1E00
> +#define OMAP4430_INSTR_MOD				0x1F00


1. In the data above, some PRCM submodules, e.g., CM1.INSTR_CM1 and 
   CM2.RESTORE_CM2, are either at the wrong address or are not listed, 
   depending on one's perspective.

2. It would be better to infix the module name in these, e.g., 
   OMAP4430_CM2_INSTR_MOD (and add PRM, CM1 variants) rather than 
   just OMAP4430_INSTR_MOD.  This will increase the number of defines but 
   will decrease 

3. The autoprcm repo has a script, gen_prcm44xx.py, that auto-generates 
   almost all of these, without the errors described above, from Benoit's
   data.  Is there some reason why we can't use the output from that 
   script?  It seems far superior to using manually-entered data.  The 
   source data comes directly from the hardware database, so the
   possibility of manual error seems lessened, and the same script should
   work with future OMAP4 revision.


- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux