On Wed, 08 Mar 2023, Nick Alcock wrote: > On 3 Mar 2023, Lee Jones verbalised: > > > On Fri, 24 Feb 2023, Nick Alcock wrote: > > > >> Since commit 8b41fc4454e ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without > >> Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations > >> are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro > >> in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing > >> object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe > >> might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. > >> > >> So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as > >> modules. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Suggested-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: linux-modules@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Cc: Hitomi Hasegawa <hasegawa-hitomi@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> --- > >> drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c | 1 - > >> drivers/mfd/omap-usb-tll.c | 1 - > >> drivers/mfd/twl4030-audio.c | 1 - > >> drivers/mfd/twl6040.c | 1 - > >> 4 files changed, 4 deletions(-) > > > > Please adapt the subject line(s) to include the drivers changed. It might > > also make sense to separate out changes to cover one driver per patch. > > The subject line is automatically generated, and uses whatever > subsystem prefix was most commonly used for all files touched in that > subsystem, while not containing any prefixes *not* so touched. > > It's also automatically split up per-subsystem from a single big source > commit that changes everything at once. I can split this bit more > finely, but that means automated regeneration will be impossible, so > it'll probably backslide if I ever have to regenerate it -- and I've had > to regenerate this series a *lot*. > > In fact if I'd split this bit per driver, I'd probably have > automatically got the subject line right as well -- but if the series as > a whole were split up like that, it'd have had about 400 patches rather > than 120, and got a lot of maintainers even more annoyed than they are > now. > > For now, I'll split this one into four and mail it out again: coming > shortly. If you haven't sent it out already, 2 will be fine. mfd: omap: ... mfd: twl: ... -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]