Re: [PATCH 26/27] mfd: remove MODULE_LICENSE in non-modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3 Mar 2023, Lee Jones verbalised:

> On Fri, 24 Feb 2023, Nick Alcock wrote:
>
>> Since commit 8b41fc4454e ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without
>> Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations
>> are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro
>> in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing
>> object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe
>> might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message.
>> 
>> So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as
>> modules.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Suggested-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-modules@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Hitomi Hasegawa <hasegawa-hitomi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ---
>>  drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c | 1 -
>>  drivers/mfd/omap-usb-tll.c  | 1 -
>>  drivers/mfd/twl4030-audio.c | 1 -
>>  drivers/mfd/twl6040.c       | 1 -
>>  4 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> Please adapt the subject line(s) to include the drivers changed.  It might
> also make sense to separate out changes to cover one driver per patch.

The subject line is automatically generated, and uses whatever
subsystem prefix was most commonly used for all files touched in that
subsystem, while not containing any prefixes *not* so touched.

It's also automatically split up per-subsystem from a single big source
commit that changes everything at once. I can split this bit more
finely, but that means automated regeneration will be impossible, so
it'll probably backslide if I ever have to regenerate it -- and I've had
to regenerate this series a *lot*.

In fact if I'd split this bit per driver, I'd probably have
automatically got the subject line right as well -- but if the series as
a whole were split up like that, it'd have had about 400 patches rather
than 120, and got a lot of maintainers even more annoyed than they are
now.

For now, I'll split this one into four and mail it out again: coming
shortly.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux