At 2022-06-28 12:38:49, "Tony Lindgren" <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>* Liang He <windhl@xxxxxxx> [220617 06:51]:
>> In omap4_sram_init(), of_find_compatible_node() will return a node
>> pointer with refcount incremented. We should use of_node_put() when
>> it is not used anymore.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c
>> index 6d1eb4eefefe..e981bf57e64f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c
>> @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ static int __init omap4_sram_init(void)
>> pr_warn("%s:Unable to allocate sram needed to handle errata I688\n",
>> __func__);
>> sram_pool = of_gen_pool_get(np, "sram", 0);
>> + of_node_put(np);
>> if (!sram_pool)
>> pr_warn("%s:Unable to get sram pool needed to handle errata I688\n",
>> __func__);
>
>Here too sram_pool is used aftger of_node_put().
>
>Regards,
>
>Tony
Thanks, Tony.
I will send a new patch to fix the order problem.
Liang
