Russell, Tony, Santosh, > Russell / Tony, > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:tony@xxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 12:50 PM > > To: Russell King - ARM Linux > > Cc: Kanigeri, Hari; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Hiroshi DOYU; > > Shilimkar, Santosh > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] ARM:OMAP4 iommu:changes in iommu for OMAP4 > > > > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [090805 01:45]: > > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 05:30:23PM -0500, Kanigeri, Hari wrote: > > > > - obj->clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, pdata->clk_name); > > > > - if (IS_ERR(obj->clk)) > > > > - goto err_clk; > > > > + /* > > > > + * FIX-ME: Replace with correct clk node when clk > > > > + * framework is available > > > > + */ > > > > + if (!cpu_is_omap44xx()) { > > > > + obj->clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, pdata->clk_name); > > > > + if (IS_ERR(obj->clk)) > > > > + goto err_clk; > > > > + } > > > > > > I've no visibility on when these are going to get resolved, and it's > > > starting to concern me that there appears to be no progress on it, > > > especially as we have more and more code being merged with these > > > workarounds. It's getting towards the point where enough is enough > > > and we need OMAP4 clk support in place, even if it is just a simple > > > stop-gap implementation rather than all these horrible hacks spread > > > through the code which one day will need to be found and removed. > > > > Yeah I agree. > The initial set of clock patches are more or less ready now and we > will posting them in next few days. > -- Ok, then. I will wait for the clock patches to resend the iommu patches. Thank you, Best regards, Hari -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
