On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > This function returns 0 unconditionally, so there is no benefit in > returning a value at all and make the caller do error checking. > > Also the caller (twl_remove()) cannot do anything sensible with an error > code. Passing it up the call stack isn't a good option because the i2c core > ignores error codes (apart from emitting an error message). > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mfd/twl-core.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/mfd/twl-core.h | 2 +- > drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c | 3 +-- > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog