On 22/12/2021 17:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/12/2021 15:18, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> Hi Roger,
>>
>> rogerq@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Tue, 21 Dec 2021 22:01:28 +0200:
>>
>>> Hi Miquel,
>>>
>>> On 21/12/2021 15:17, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>>> As more compatibles can be added to the GPMC NAND controller driver
>>>> use a compatible match table.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 6 +++++-
>>>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c | 5 +----
>>>
>>> Will need your Ack for this one as well. Thanks :)
>>>
>>>
>>>> include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h | 9 ++++++++-
>>>> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> -roger
>>>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
>>>> index 624153048182..d19ffc895e5b 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
>>>> @@ -2091,6 +2091,7 @@ static int gpmc_probe_generic_child(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>> u32 val;
>>>> struct gpio_desc *waitpin_desc = NULL;
>>>> struct gpmc_device *gpmc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>> + bool is_nand = false;
>>>>
>>>> if (of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &cs) < 0) {
>>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%pOF has no 'reg' property\n",
>>>> @@ -2183,7 +2184,10 @@ static int gpmc_probe_generic_child(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "ti,omap2-nand")) {
>>>> + if (of_match_node(omap_nand_ids, child))
>>>> + is_nand = true;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (is_nand) {
>>
>> nitpick: why this intermediate variable?
>>
>
> Indeed, it looks useless. I think it is left-over from previous version.
> I will remove it while applying.
You are right. Thanks for saving me a re-spin Krzysztof :)
cheers,
-roger
