On 22/12/2021 15:18, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> rogerq@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Tue, 21 Dec 2021 22:01:28 +0200:
>
>> Hi Miquel,
>>
>> On 21/12/2021 15:17, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> As more compatibles can be added to the GPMC NAND controller driver
>>> use a compatible match table.
>>>
>>> Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 6 +++++-
>>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c | 5 +----
>>
>> Will need your Ack for this one as well. Thanks :)
>>
>>
>>> include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h | 9 ++++++++-
>>> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> cheers,
>> -roger
>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
>>> index 624153048182..d19ffc895e5b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
>>> @@ -2091,6 +2091,7 @@ static int gpmc_probe_generic_child(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>> u32 val;
>>> struct gpio_desc *waitpin_desc = NULL;
>>> struct gpmc_device *gpmc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>> + bool is_nand = false;
>>>
>>> if (of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &cs) < 0) {
>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%pOF has no 'reg' property\n",
>>> @@ -2183,7 +2184,10 @@ static int gpmc_probe_generic_child(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "ti,omap2-nand")) {
>>> + if (of_match_node(omap_nand_ids, child))
>>> + is_nand = true;
>>> +
>>> + if (is_nand) {
>
> nitpick: why this intermediate variable?
>
Indeed, it looks useless. I think it is left-over from previous version.
I will remove it while applying.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
