Hi Santosh,
On 11/16/20 11:22 AM, Grzegorz Jaszczyk wrote:
> Since the of_device_get_match_data() doesn't return error code, remove
> wrong IS_ERR test. Proper check against NULL pointer is already done
> later before usage: if (data && data->...).
>
> Additionally, proceeding with empty device data is valid (e.g. in case
> of "ti,am3356-pruss").
>
> Fixes: ba59c9b43c86 ("soc: ti: pruss: support CORECLK_MUX and IEPCLK_MUX")
> Reported-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <grzegorz.jaszczyk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx>
Can you please pick this up for 5.10-rc's?
Thanks,
Suman
> ---
> v1->v2:
> - Add the appropriate Fixes: tag.
> - %s/Remove/Fix/ in patch title.
> - Add Suman's Acked-by.
> ---
> drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c b/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c
> index cc0b4ad7a3d3..5d6e7132a5c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c
> @@ -126,8 +126,6 @@ static int pruss_clk_init(struct pruss *pruss, struct device_node *cfg_node)
> int ret = 0;
>
> data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> - if (IS_ERR(data))
> - return -ENODEV;
>
> clks_np = of_get_child_by_name(cfg_node, "clocks");
> if (!clks_np) {
> @@ -175,10 +173,6 @@ static int pruss_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> const char *mem_names[PRUSS_MEM_MAX] = { "dram0", "dram1", "shrdram2" };
>
> data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> - if (IS_ERR(data)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "missing private data\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
>
> ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> if (ret) {
>
