Re: get_irq_regs() from soft IRQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 29 June 2009 19:37:57 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 07:36:57PM +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
> > On Monday 29 June 2009 17:31:18 ext Jean Pihet wrote:
> > > I am trying to get the latest IRQ registers from a timer or a work
> > > queue but I am running into problems:
> > > - get_irq_regs() returns NULL in some cases, so it is unsuable and even
> > > causes crash when trying to get the registers values from the returned
> > > ptr - I never get user space registers, only kernel
> > >
> > > The use case is that the performance unit (PMNC) of the Cortex A8 has
> > > some serious bug, in short the performance counters overflow IRQ is to
> > > be avoided. The solution I am implementing is to read and reset the
> > > counters from a work queue that is triggered by a timer.
> >
> > Regarding this oprofile related part. I wonder how you can get oprofile
> > working properly (providing non-bogus results) without performance
> > counters overflow IRQ generation?
>
> I don't think you can - triggering capture on overflow is precisely how
> oprofile works.
>
> The erratum talks about polling for overflow.  By doing this, you are in
> a well defined part of the kernel, which is obviously going to be shown
> as a hot path for every counter, thus making oprofile useless for kernel
> work.
I think it is possible, well if you except the get_irq_regs() problem.
The idea is to read and reset the counters before the overflow, instead of 
loading them with a small negative value and waiting for the overflow to 
happen.

> Deferring the interrupt to a workqueue doesn't resolve the problem either.
> The problem has nothing to do with what happens after the interrupt
> occurs - it's about interrupts themselves being lost.
The errata is about a lost event and/or a lock-up of the PMNC unit at the time 
of overflow.

> I think just accepting that this erratum breaks oprofile is the only
> realistic solution. ;(
Completely agree. However it would be nice to have a workaround, as un-elegant 
as it can be ;(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux