Hi Ladis, > Am 17.02.2020 um 21:19 schrieb Ladislav Michl <ladis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Hi Nikolaus, > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 08:33:52PM +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >> Hi Ladis, >> >>> Am 17.02.2020 um 20:07 schrieb Ladislav Michl <ladis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> Linux kernel prints so many lines on bootup and only few of them are >>> valuable. Lets improve it by printing error value to give a clue >>> why it failed. >> >> Hm. The upstream code does already print the error. This feature is not removed. >> But it is also printing an error in the EPROBE_DEFER case as well, where it is >> not needed or not an error. > > It seems you missed I'm printing also error _value_. Indeed. Well, usually there is no error so adding the error number is not of much use (except for debugging)... The most likely one seems to be -EPROBE_DEFER. On the omap5 boards where I have seen the error message being printed they were EPROBE_DEFER. So your proposal changes the subject (which has a very small focus). > The rest of discussion > would need disassembly and I'll do it once I'll be waiting for yet another > long run recompile. :) BR and thanks, Nikolaus
