> Am 17.02.2020 um 14:38 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> If the gpios are probed after this driver (e.g. if they
> come from an i2c expander) there is no need to print an
> error message.
>
> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
> index edc5016f46f1..cea58d0cb457 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
> @@ -205,14 +205,18 @@ static int palmas_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> palmas_usb->id_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "id",
> GPIOD_IN);
> - if (IS_ERR(palmas_usb->id_gpiod)) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(palmas_usb->id_gpiod) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + } else if (IS_ERR(palmas_usb->id_gpiod)) {
Hm.
While looking again at that: why do we need the "{" and "} else "?
It should be sufficient to have
> palmas_usb->id_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "id",
> GPIOD_IN);
> + if (PTR_ERR(palmas_usb->id_gpiod) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> if (IS_ERR(palmas_usb->id_gpiod)) {
What do you think is better coding style here?
BR,
Nikolaus Schaller
