* Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> [200214 12:50]: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 02:41:30PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > On 12/02/2020 16.35, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > Oops, that's not good. So should we just keep the old naming if there's > > > only one endpoint? > > > That's an option, yes, if we really need extra dummy McBSP DAIs at all, > > again, let's hear from Morimoto-san or Mark. > > We really shouldn't need dummy DAIs at all I think, if we do it feels > like there's a problem. It's quite possible that there is actually a > problem here though... It's dummy in the droid4 voice call case as mcbsp is not the clock-master and there's nothing to configure for mcbsp. But I guess in some cases mcbsp could be the clock-master and then the secondary DAI would have ops. I could be wrong though, this is just based on my experience with getting one device working. Regards, Tony
