On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 02:41:30PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > On 12/02/2020 16.35, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Oops, that's not good. So should we just keep the old naming if there's > > only one endpoint? > That's an option, yes, if we really need extra dummy McBSP DAIs at all, > again, let's hear from Morimoto-san or Mark. We really shouldn't need dummy DAIs at all I think, if we do it feels like there's a problem. It's quite possible that there is actually a problem here though...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
