* Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> [191024 08:04]: > On 02/10/2019 15:06, Tero Kristo wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The existing divider clock support appears to have an inherent bug > > because of the bit field width implementation and limitation of divider > > values based on this. The limitation by bit field only is not enough, > > as we can have divider settings which accept only certain range of > > dividers within the full range of the bit-field. > > > > Because of this, the divider clock is re-implemented to use min,max,mask > > values instead of just the bit-field. > > Queued this up for 5.4 fixes, thanks. > > Tony, do you have anything against the DT patch going in with the rest of > this or should it be dropped? No that won't cause merge conflicts so please merge the dts change along with the rest of the series. So for the dts change: Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
