* Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> [190916 16:01]: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:45 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > * Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> [190913 21:12]: > > > Tony, > > > > > > Go ahead and discard both the original and v2 of this. Based on > > > feedback from others, it seems like the other series I did which > > > configured the temp sensor for all omap3 should be sufficient. > > > > Yeah OK I've tagged all the RFC threads as read now. > > > > > Once there has been enough time for people to review the other RFC, > > > I'll resubmit with a more proper patch giving some of the credit to > > > Nikolaus for convincing me to do this. > > > > Yes please do :) At least I've already lost track of > > all the pending patches related to cpufreq and thermal > > and voltage stuff. So several complete non-rfc sets > > is probably what everybody is waiting for to review. > > AFAICT, Niklaus' patch series for cpufreq is no longer in RFC status. > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11141655/ OK that looks good to me and I just acked the patches I did not already ack earlier. > Once his patches have been applied, I'll rebase and resubmit without > the RFC against whatever branch you want. Yes so hopefully we'll an immutable cpufreq branch we can all use as a base. Regards, Tony
