On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:45 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > * Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> [190913 21:12]: > > Tony, > > > > Go ahead and discard both the original and v2 of this. Based on > > feedback from others, it seems like the other series I did which > > configured the temp sensor for all omap3 should be sufficient. > > Yeah OK I've tagged all the RFC threads as read now. > > > Once there has been enough time for people to review the other RFC, > > I'll resubmit with a more proper patch giving some of the credit to > > Nikolaus for convincing me to do this. > > Yes please do :) At least I've already lost track of > all the pending patches related to cpufreq and thermal > and voltage stuff. So several complete non-rfc sets > is probably what everybody is waiting for to review. AFAICT, Niklaus' patch series for cpufreq is no longer in RFC status. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11141655/ Once his patches have been applied, I'll rebase and resubmit without the RFC against whatever branch you want. I just want to make sure I'm using the right base from which to start. adam > > Regards, > > Tony >