* Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> [090617 01:35]: > code comment below: > > On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [090615 09:05]: > > > Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > > > Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > >> > > > >> * Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [090612 15:13]: > > > >>> Here's a couple patches to add-back some feature dropped in the > > > >>> mainline sync. These are needed for the PM branch among other things. > > > >>> > > > >>> Applies to linux-omap master. > > > >>> > > > >>> Kevin Hilman (1): > > > >>> OMAP2/3: SoC IDs: add omap_type() for determining GP/EMU/HS > > > >> > > > >> Is there any reason to get this one into mainline early? > > > > > > > > Well, the PM branch has a dependency, but also the recenetly submitted > > > > qwatchdog driver has a dependency. > > > > > > > >> If not, I suggest you keep this in your pm branch for next merge > > > >> window that I can keep merging to l-o master as needed. > > > >> > > > >> However, if omap_type() is by other queues earlier, then I can > > > >> add it into my upstream queue. If this blocks several queues > > > >> from being rebased against mainline kernel, that alone might > > > >> already be a good enough reason to get it in early. > > > > > > > > I think it should go via your upstream queue. I imagine some of the > > > > other upcoming driver submissions from TI will have a dependency as > > > > well since there is still some missing EMU/HS support ind drivers. > > > > > > Also, I'm carrying this SRAM patch below for HS/EMU that could go into > > > Paul's SRAM/SDRC queue if this omap_type() gets merged sooner rather > > > than later. > > > > Hmm, the HS omap sram.c patch below for sure justifies fixing it as > > incorrect SRAM size can cause nasty bugs. > > > > Will add both omap_type and the sram.c patch below to omap-fixes. > > > > Regards, > > > > Tony > > > > > Kevin > > > > > > commit 106588e30f070d9a8d5906d409e0b9aad89edc9e > > > Author: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Thu Oct 9 17:47:02 2008 +0300 > > > > > > OMAP3: SRAM size fix for HS/EMU devices > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c > > > old mode 100644 > > > new mode 100755 > > > index 65006df..f40bd2d > > > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c > > > @@ -131,9 +131,15 @@ void __init omap_detect_sram(void) > > > if (cpu_class_is_omap2()) { > > > if (is_sram_locked()) { > > > if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) { > > > - omap_sram_base = OMAP3_SRAM_PUB_VA; > > > - omap_sram_start = OMAP3_SRAM_PUB_PA; > > > - omap_sram_size = 0x8000; /* 32K */ > > > + if (omap_type() == OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP) { > > > + omap_sram_base = OMAP3_SRAM_PUB_VA; > > > + omap_sram_start = OMAP3_SRAM_PUB_PA; > > > + omap_sram_size = 0x8000; /* 32K */ > > > + } else { > > This would be better if it specifically tested for HS and EMU devices. > There are at least two other omap_type() possibilities here, "TEST" and > "BAD" Tero, can you please repost? I will hold on sending out the omap-fixes for that, and refresh omap-fixes with the updated patch. Tony > > > + omap_sram_base = OMAP3_SRAM_PUB_VA; > > > + omap_sram_start = OMAP3_SRAM_PUB_PA; > > > + omap_sram_size = 0x7000; /* 28K */ > > > + } > > > } else { > > > omap_sram_base = OMAP2_SRAM_PUB_VA; > > > omap_sram_start = OMAP2_SRAM_PUB_PA; > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > > - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html