* Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [190404 10:53]: > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 13:40:33 -0700 > Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [190401 18:39]: > > > Could we somehow describe this property of the hardware > > > (is-offmode-capable or is-wired-for-offmode) as a separate devicetree > > > property of the soc? > > > > > > In mmc we have for example "cap-power-off-card" for > > > indicating some is-wired-suitable-for thing. > > > > And we also have "regulator-off-in-suspend". > > > > How about "soc-off-in-suspend" for the generic name? > > > Well, remember my "omap3: give off mode enable a more prominent place" > maybe we can use the same capability property for both proposes. Yes. I don't think we need a Kconfig option for it though. Seems just a device specific property should be enough for now. Regards, Tony
