"Hald, Ulrik Bech" <ubh@xxxxxx> writes:
[...]
>> >>
>> >> Again, red flag: cpu_is_*
>> >>
>> >> It might be more consistent to use pdev->dev->name which is already of
>> >> the form "watchdog.%d".
>> >
>> > Not sure I follow. I don't see a "name" field in struct device, only
>> init_name.
>>
>> Sorry, I meant dev->bus_id. Look at dev_set_name() which creates
>> a bus_id of the form ("%s.%d", pdev->name, pdev->id)
>
> As far as I can see, dev->bus_id has been removed from the device
> struct as per 1fa5ae857bb14f6046205171d98506d8112dd74e.
> Furthermore, the pdev->name is "omap_wdt", which should be presented
> as "watchdog" in wdev->omap_wdt_miscdev.name anyway, so I think I'll
> just go with the sprintf() approach below, keeping your wdt_name
> comments in mind.
OK
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
