On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 08:06:30PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:04:16 +0100
> Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 07:06:40PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > > The GTA04 has a w2sg0004 or w2sg0084 gps chip. Not detectable
> > > which one is mounted so use the compatibility entry for w2sg0004
> > > for all which will work for both.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v3:
> > > - converted to a patchset
> > > - added vcc-supply
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - some s/gps/gnss/
> > > - not added vcc-supply because the regulator is not modelled
> > > in dts at all
> > >
> > > w2sg0004 bindings are in next-20190129
> > >
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi
> > > index 02d8274a2f47..4ea0f7dc37c6 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi
> > > @@ -320,6 +320,12 @@
> > > >;
> > > };
> > >
> > > + gps_pins: pinmux_gps_pins {
> >
> > s/gps/gnss/ would be more consistent, but whatever.
> >
> well, gps is already in the file at another place. So it is a bit
> inconsistent in any case, without further cleanup. If someone comes
> up with a strong opinion here I would of course change it.
Up to you. As long as the gnss node is named "gnss" I don't have a
strong opinion on the other names (as long as they follow the spec of
course).
Johan
