On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 4:09 PM Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 01:50:56PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:00 PM Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > The boot_lock is something that was required for ARM development > > > platforms to ensure that the delay calibration worked properly. This > > > is not necessary for modern platforms that have better bus bandwidth > > > and do not need to calibrate the delay loop for secondary cores. > > > Remove the boot_lock entirely. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Andy have you had a chance to test/apply this patch? > > I would rather folk do not _apply_ these patches - the final patch > is dependent on all the preceeding patches, and if they're applied > to individual trees, it will mean that the final patch has to be > delayed by a complete kernel development cycle to avoid bisect > breakage. Ah good point. It's way better that you queue it up indeed. Yours, Linus Walleij
