* Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> [181018 22:15]: > Hi! > > > > I want to make it clear that I don't want to claim any privilege in getting > > > patches merged first. I am however worried that, without an easy way to test > > > DSI support, and without enough time to focus on it, I would break whatever > > > would be merged now in future reworks. I would thus like to find out how to > > > collaborate on this task, hopefully to move towards usage of drm_bridge and > > > drm_panel for DSI-based pipelines. > > > > Real users with mainline kernel with a real product should > > always have priority over any ongoing clean-up. > > > > And for testing, a bunch of real users is something you can't > > beat for proper testing of code on ongoing basis! > > > > Naturally the burden of getting the patches ready is on the people > > using them for rebase and fixing comments. And Sebastian has > > already agreed help with maintaining it. > > > > I've been actually using DSI command mode support and testing > > Linux next several times a week to prevent regressions from > > sneaking into -rc1 in general. So now I can't test omapdrm with > > next until Sebastian is done with rebasing.. Back to headless > > testing then. > > > > Anyways, I'd say let's add the DSI command mode support ASAP after > > rebasing, there are at least Sebastian, Pavel and I then testing > > and helping with further ongoing panel conversion work. > > Are there any news here? Does someone have a patch set that actually > works? I was wondering about that too.. I only have the v4.19-rc1 based patches and can no longer test with Linux next. Sebastian, any update? > Are there any in-progress patches I could help with? I can put in some effort too if needed. Regards, Tony
