Hi! > > I want to make it clear that I don't want to claim any privilege in getting > > patches merged first. I am however worried that, without an easy way to test > > DSI support, and without enough time to focus on it, I would break whatever > > would be merged now in future reworks. I would thus like to find out how to > > collaborate on this task, hopefully to move towards usage of drm_bridge and > > drm_panel for DSI-based pipelines. > > Real users with mainline kernel with a real product should > always have priority over any ongoing clean-up. > > And for testing, a bunch of real users is something you can't > beat for proper testing of code on ongoing basis! > > Naturally the burden of getting the patches ready is on the people > using them for rebase and fixing comments. And Sebastian has > already agreed help with maintaining it. > > I've been actually using DSI command mode support and testing > Linux next several times a week to prevent regressions from > sneaking into -rc1 in general. So now I can't test omapdrm with > next until Sebastian is done with rebasing.. Back to headless > testing then. > > Anyways, I'd say let's add the DSI command mode support ASAP after > rebasing, there are at least Sebastian, Pavel and I then testing > and helping with further ongoing panel conversion work. Are there any news here? Does someone have a patch set that actually works? Are there any in-progress patches I could help with? Thanks, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
