On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 07:54:32AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > But the implemenation of that should not hold up this revert because > this patch breaks *all* wakeups since the PRCM interrupt itself is > disabled in the suspend path. That is not mentioned in the patch description (and it should be). What this paragraph is saying is that this revert is most definitely fixing a regression. Any "fix" which causes other breakage is not a fix, and therefore this revert needs to go in no matter what. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
